Re: Guerilla Warfare

by KristallNacht Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:22 am

I never said it was radar.

I refer to it as 'x ray' lol sincei don't know what it is but it does what x-rays do.

by Gauz Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:55 am

As interesting as this conversation about how we can see through the ground is...

We should be talking about the topic..

Well PiE you got your answer, so I think that we can officially say this is done. Or like all other threads this one isn't made to be answered... just argued.

by PiEdude Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:32 pm

I try to avoid arguments, I really do.

Well, at least I posted this in the debate sectionl

by PiEdude Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:33 pm

KristallNacht wrote:I never said it was radar.

I refer to it as 'x ray' lol sincei don't know what it is but it does what x-rays do.

From what I heard, spy satalites do use some kind of Radar (obviously not the same kind used in jets) to look a few dozen or so feet underground. It won't give an exact layout, just tell them whether or not what they're looking at is a solid object.

by **Kasrkin Seath** Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:53 pm

Its not RADAR though. RADAR is an acronym for a specific system.

by PiEdude Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:04 pm

Seath, I mean they're using some specific wavelength, or I don't know how they do it, I just know that they do it.

I'm not a physics expert, just a military observer.

by Kis_BF Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:53 pm

Kislany wrote:
Ukurse wrote:The reason most European influenced (England, USA, Australia Etc) Countries don't win against gorilla warfare is because we use chivalry.
Well, not really, but we follow the basic idea of it.
We could blow up the country, but we don't, because there are innocent civilian, well there are heaps of other countries that couldn't care if there are innocent civilians in the area they will blow up, just as long as those innocents belong to the opposing Countries/Force's, then it is fine because they know it will have an impact on the Government.

i agree....
this is why we never got anywhere with fighting these people....

unlike some cultures we have a higher moral code then them

yup yup

by Dud Doodoo Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:36 pm

KristallNacht wrote:I never said it was radar.

I refer to it as 'x ray' lol sincei don't know what it is but it does what x-rays do.

It's definitely not x-ray, since all an xray does is shoot radiation through a persons body to a sheet of special "paper" behind it, and the thicker the material the more rays get reflected, and do not end up on the sheet of paper. The result is you can essentially see through the skin. Something like that would not work for tunnels.

by Zaki90 Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:32 pm

Dud Doodoo wrote:
KristallNacht wrote:I never said it was radar.

I refer to it as 'x ray' lol sincei don't know what it is but it does what x-rays do.

It's definitely not x-ray, since all an xray does is shoot radiation through a persons body to a sheet of special "paper" behind it, and the thicker the material the more rays get reflected, and do not end up on the sheet of paper. The result is you can essentially see through the skin. Something like that would not work for tunnels.

My point exactly. And even if they did work, all you get is 2d picture of dirt from a top angle.

by **Angatar** Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:38 pm

So he says it's not an x-ray and you're arguing against him that it's not an x-ray?

by Zaki90 Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:05 pm

Angatar wrote:So he says it's not an x-ray and you're arguing against him that it's not an x-ray?

I am agreeing with Dud...(um)dooduddoodo? and arguing with Krystal Naucht (spelling)

by **Angatar** Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:19 pm

So now you're saying you're doing what I said you were doing, but you're arguing with me about that?

by Gauz Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:15 am

Its not hard to spell Kristallnacht... unless your a non-german.

SEIG HEIL!

by RX Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:26 am

x Gauz x wrote:Its not hard to spell Kristallnacht... unless your a non-german.

SEIG HEIL!

It's not that hard to remember SIEG heil either Razz

by Gauz Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:28 am

Shut the hell up

I always mix up my ei's and ie's in german

by **Kasrkin Seath** Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:16 am

Mapping the tunnels likely has to do more with sensors to find distortions casued by tunnles rather than actually sending out a signal to 'scan' them

by Zaki90 Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:23 pm

Angatar wrote:So now you're saying you're doing what I said you were doing, but you're arguing with me about that?

Never mind, this is too confusing.

by Elabajaba Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:55 pm

We should just remove all the troops from a large radius, and nuke them. (don't consider the consequences, just think in terms of immediately killing lots of them, then having a lot more of them die due to the radiation. That, or "accidentally" bomb/sabotage a nuclear power plant.)

by Zaki90 Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:28 pm

Elabajaba wrote:We should just remove all the troops from a large radius, and nuke them. (don't consider the consequences, just think in terms of immediately killing lots of them, then having a lot more of them die due to the radiation. That, or "accidentally" bomb/sabotage a nuclear power plant.)

And if they were in American or Allied territory? And most are in deep underground tunnels. Also, they are spread out. Very spread out. And we don't know where they are.

Also, don't screw with radiation. Remember Chernobyl. No one lives there anymore. Some parts are still irradiated. And it cost $200 BILLION DOLLARS to clean up. ( Most expensive disaster in the history of man)

by **BBJynne** Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:37 pm

I think we should just unleash an army of gorillas into the area.

by **Kasrkin Seath** Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:05 pm

A nuke would not cause radiation to spread like chernobyl did.
and even if they are hiding, they would probably still be killed, or would not survive for very long as they couldn't leave.

by Gauz Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:28 pm

Seath is right, a nuke does not do what Chernobyl did. That was a entire nuclear reactor that broke down, which cause a nuclear fallout much greater the size and strength of any nuclear bomb.

Nuclear fallout eventually drifts away though..

by Zaki90 Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:43 pm

Elabajaba wrote:We should just remove all the troops from a large radius, and nuke them. (don't consider the consequences, just think in terms of immediately killing lots of them, then having a lot more of them die due to the radiation. That, or "accidentally" bomb/sabotage a nuclear power plant.)

Kasrkin Seath wrote:A nuke would not cause radiation to spread like chernobyl did.
and even if they are hiding, they would probably still be killed, or would not survive for very long as they couldn't leave.

x Gauz x wrote:Seath is right, a nuke does not do what Chernobyl did. That was a entire nuclear reactor that broke down, which cause a nuclear fallout much greater the size and strength of any nuclear bomb.

Nuclear fallout eventually drifts away though..

I was talking about "sabotaging or bombing a nuclear power plant".

by KristallNacht Mon Jun 15, 2009 3:49 pm

Elabajaba wrote:That, or "accidentally" bomb/sabotage a nuclear power plant.)

you are aware that nuclear powerplants (even the shitty ones in russia) can't really meltdown anymore.

Nuclear power is the safest energy source known to man (not counting solar, but nuclear provides a SHIT load more for less)

by Zaki90 Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:49 pm

KristallNacht wrote:
Elabajaba wrote:That, or "accidentally" bomb/sabotage a nuclear power plant.)

you are aware that nuclear powerplants (even the shitty ones in russia) can't really meltdown anymore.

Nuclear power is the safest energy source known to man (not counting solar, but nuclear provides a SHIT load more for less)

If you put a bomb in a nuclear reactor the neutron poisons and neutron moderators are not there to stop the chain reaction because they went KABOOM!

Wikipedia,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_meltdown:

In an uncontrolled power excursion accident, a sudden power spike in the reactor exceeds reactor design specifications due to a sudden increase in reactor reactivity. An uncontrolled power excursion occurs due to significantly altering a parameter that affects the exponential rate of a nuclear chain reaction.

You get a nuclear meltdown.

by Sponsored content