How to Train Your Dragon

It's so cute!

The movie was good, any of you seen it?

It was good/alright.

Haven't seen it yet.

Considering Ringleader's taste/general opinions on movies, it sounds really great.

i'm going on saturday, the animation in it looks good, voice acting of the lead character bugs me though

Yeah, the lead character was one of the discrepancies I had. Annoying teenage nerd, in the ads, when the fireball hits his door when he closes it, he says dragons like "draahggehnshh", like some nerdy/sinus-y teenager, for no reason...

And he explains things annoyingly, like how we would if we went back in time and somehow became a Viking, for no reason.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88x08ePynt0&feature=related

And when she 'busts' them, he says "DUH DUH DAAAH, were dead." Like a kid...

All of the dragons looked, not like dragons, and not at all like they were well designed, except for night fury, it just seemed like an overlooked design flaw, how they all looked so absurdly different from each other. I thought the movie was still good, even though it is not revolutionary or anything.

Also, The Hangover sucked, so...

I still do want to see it. In Imax 3D. I do enjoy the animated movies.

Meh.
Just didn't seem like my kind of thing... Might rent it when it comes out on DVD...

I loved WALL-E, by the way... Haven't seen Up.

I find Pixar movies are a pretty decent, and are always worth atleast an hour or two of you time.
This isn't made by Pixar, but it looks (As far as I can tell) quite similar to movies they would do.

I won't watch movie at the cinemas, but in a few years I might watches it if it is on TV.
If I was given free tickets, obviously I would go, but I don't have free tickets...

Ringleader wrote:Yeah, the lead character was one of the discrepancies I had. Annoying teenage nerd, in the ads, when the fireball hits his door when he closes it, he says dragons like "draahggehnshh", like some nerdy/sinus-y teenager, for no reason...

And he explains things annoyingly, like how we would if we went back in time and somehow became a Viking, for no reason.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88x08ePynt0&feature=related

And when she 'busts' them, he says "DUH DUH DAAAH, were dead." Like a kid...

All of the dragons looked, not like dragons, and not at all like they were well designed, except for night fury, it just seemed like an overlooked design flaw, how they all looked so absurdly different from each other. I thought the movie was still good, even though it is not revolutionary or anything.

Also, The Hangover sucked, so...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You're opinion is invalid because of this statement.

PiEdude wrote:

Ringleader wrote:Yeah, the lead character was one of the discrepancies I had. Annoying teenage nerd, in the ads, when the fireball hits his door when he closes it, he says dragons like "draahggehnshh", like some nerdy/sinus-y teenager, for no reason...

And he explains things annoyingly, like how we would if we went back in time and somehow became a Viking, for no reason.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88x08ePynt0&feature=related

And when she 'busts' them, he says "DUH DUH DAAAH, were dead." Like a kid...

All of the dragons looked, not like dragons, and not at all like they were well designed, except for night fury, it just seemed like an overlooked design flaw, how they all looked so absurdly different from each other. I thought the movie was still good, even though it is not revolutionary or anything.

Also, The Hangover sucked, so...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You're opinion is invalid because of this statement.

As much as i hate to agree with Pie, i agree with Pie.

The main character probably has childish dialogue because....


He is one...

The lack of Dragonite makes me sad

Sorry late with reply, but it was a good movie. A friend of mine who hates anything animated even said it was good.

Ring, maybe he sounded like a nerdy teen because, he, *gasps* WAS?

I've been told it was a great movie... but I'm a little skeptical just because of the fact that it's a children's story.

CivBase wrote:I've been told it was a great movie... but I'm a little skeptical just because of the fact that it's a children's story.

It's suprisingly good for a movie directed at kids.

Gold Spartan5 wrote:Ring, maybe he sounded like a nerdy teen because, he, *gasps* WAS?

Ok?

when did I ever question what he was? I knew he is a nerdy teen, that's basically all I wrote about, surprisingly they don't make for very likable actors, my actual point if you had the capacity to understand it/ respond in a meaningful manner.



I basically said- "The main character is a nerdy, annoying teen, and I didn't like that."

Your response- "He was a nerdy teen because he was a nerdy teen!"


Yeah, way to analyze that Freud...

I liked the movie by the way, 7.5 to 8 out of 10.

(for what it was)

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

CivBase wrote:I've been told it was a great movie... but I'm a little skeptical just because of the fact that it's a children's story.

It's suprisingly good for a movie directed at kids.

Quite a few movies are "Surprisingly good for a movie directed at kids."
All Dogs go to Heaven, Toy Story, The Incredibles, Chicken Run, Shrek...
What made this one special?

Ringleader wrote:

Gold Spartan5 wrote:Ring, maybe he sounded like a nerdy teen because, he, *gasps* WAS?

Ok?

when did I ever question what he was? I knew he is a nerdy teen, that's basically all I wrote about, surprisingly they don't make for very likable actors, my actual point if you had the capacity to understand it/ respond in a meaningful manner.



I basically said- "The main character is a nerdy, annoying teen, and I didn't like that."

Your response- "He was a nerdy teen because he was a nerdy teen!"


Yeah, way to analyze that Freud...

Ringleader wrote:Yeah, the lead character was one of the discrepancies I had. Annoying teenage nerd, in the ads, when the fireball hits his door when he closes it, he says dragons like "draahggehnshh", like some nerdy/sinus-y teenager, for no reason...

And he explains things annoyingly, like how we would if we went back in time and somehow became a Viking, for no reason.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88x08ePynt0&feature=related

And when she 'busts' them, he says "DUH DUH DAAAH, were dead." Like a kid...

All of the dragons looked, not like dragons, and not at all like they were well designed, except for night fury, it just seemed like an overlooked design flaw, how they all looked so absurdly different from each other. I thought the movie was still good, even though it is not revolutionary or anything.

Also, The Hangover sucked, so...

You keep on saying "like a kid" (or something like that), implying that you thought that he wasn't.

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

CivBase wrote:I've been told it was a great movie... but I'm a little skeptical just because of the fact that it's a children's story.

It's suprisingly good for a movie directed at kids.

Quite a few movies are "Surprisingly good for a movie directed at kids."
All Dogs go to Heaven, Toy Story, The Incredibles, Chicken Run, Shrek...
What made this one special?

It's better than those movies.

ntm Finding Nemo, Monsters Vs Aliens, Cars

basically the 'movies directed at kids' have a history of being exceptionally good as compared to every other genre.

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:Meh.
Just didn't seem like my kind of thing... Might rent it when it comes out on DVD...

I loved WALL-E, by the way... Haven't seen Up.

I've recently seen Up.

The story was surprisingly good even by Pixar's standards. I actually found myself being quite attached to the characters.

ITS A FUCKING MOVIE DEVELOPED FOR 5-8 YEAROLDS WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU DISAPPOINTED IF IT 'SUCKED'... americans...

The Pariah wrote:ITS A FUCKING MOVIE DEVELOPED FOR 5-8 YEAROLDS WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU DISAPPOINTED IF IT 'SUCKED'... americans...

MANY PEOPLE IN THIS THREAD HAVE PRAISED IT SO FAR AS WELL WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT THE ONES WHO DISAGREE?
Brits...