Re: Charlie in the Chocolate Factory

by Gold Spartan Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:29 am

Vigil wrote:
Ukurse wrote:Oh, fuck I hate the 1971 version.
Stupid as fuck music, a 2 year old baby could make racket more pleasing to the ears, with a tin can and a spoon. When I watched the 1971 movie, I had to change the channel every time they broke out into a musical.

2005 version is 1million times better, it had bearable music, anyone who says otherwise is deaf. Plus some actors that could actual act.

You think this is better?

With that kind of ear rape, I'D PREFER TO BE DEAF.

Agreed.

by MrX Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:42 am

Gold Spartan5 wrote:
Vigil wrote:
Ukurse wrote:Oh, fuck I hate the 1971 version.
Stupid as fuck music, a 2 year old baby could make racket more pleasing to the ears, with a tin can and a spoon. When I watched the 1971 movie, I had to change the channel every time they broke out into a musical.

2005 version is 1million times better, it had bearable music, anyone who says otherwise is deaf. Plus some actors that could actual act.

You think this is better?

With that kind of ear rape, I'D PREFER TO BE DEAF.
Agreed.

agreed

plus when your a child the music is sorta magic in the 1971 version

by Nocbl2 Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:59 am

Vigil wrote:
Ukurse wrote:Oh, fuck I hate the 1971 version.
Stupid as fuck music, a 2 year old baby could make racket more pleasing to the ears, with a tin can and a spoon. When I watched the 1971 movie, I had to change the channel every time they broke out into a musical.

2005 version is 1million times better, it had bearable music, anyone who says otherwise is deaf. Plus some actors that could actual act.

You think this is better?

With that kind of ear rape, I'D PREFER TO BE DEAF.

I'd kill myself either way. It's just '05 had less of the super-cracked out musicals.