Charlie in the Chocolate Factory

Anyway, which version of it do you like more. The book (original one made in 1964) , the movie ( the old one made in 1971), or the other movie(the newest one made in 2005 with Johnny Depp)

Zaki90 wrote:Anyway, which version of it do you like more. The book (original one made in 1964) , the movie ( the old one made in 1971), or the other movie(the newest one made in 2005 with Johnny Depp)

Your list is fixed.

i go for the oldies...

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

Zaki90 wrote:Anyway, which version of it do you like more. The book (original one made in 1964) , the movie ( the old one made in 1971), or the other movie(the newest one made in 2005 with Johnny Depp)

Your list is fixed.

What's wrong the with old movie. Umpa lumpa dompadee doo...

Zaki90 wrote:

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

Zaki90 wrote:Anyway, which version of it do you like more. The book (original one made in 1964) , the movie ( the old one made in 1971), or the other movie(the newest one made in 2005 with Johnny Depp)

Your list is fixed.

What's wrong the with old movie. Umpa lumpa dompadee doo...

You mean, besides the fact it had nothing to do with the books besides a rough outline of what happened?

yep...

The 1971 version. Had the best music, entertainment value and was the closest I think they got to the book.

I mean all the music from that film is instantly memorable.

although the 2005 film is closer to the source material... the 1971 version is a much better movie and therefore gets my vote

I can bitch about the '71 one all I want, but it's the best of the three.

I can't condone anything that speaks against TV or Video Games, so I'll stay out of this one.

you mean the most recent one? i personally prefer the first movie, the newer one had more comedy value, and count doku as a father and a dentist... just no

You were watching this on Disney Channel last night I presume?

no i saw it in theaters.

I was actually talking to Zaki.

I'm sorry Tim Burton, but......

1:38 on the second video XD LMFAO

I like the 2005 one better, more because there's less super-cracked out musicals.

I cant believe no one has said this, at least to be a n ass, but the list is messed up cause there was only a book and one movie entitled CHARLIE and the chocolate factory

your completely right i noticed this when i saw the thread but didnt really feel like pointing it out

I go with Roald Dahl.
So, the book.

Oh, fuck I hate the 1971 version.
Stupid as fuck music, a 2 year old baby could make racket more pleasing to the ears, with a tin can and a spoon. When I watched the 1971 movie, I had to change the channel every time they broke out into a musical.

2005 version is 1million times better, it had bearable music, anyone who says otherwise is deaf. Plus some actors that could actual act.

TNine wrote:You were watching this on Disney Channel last night I presume?

Nope...

I actually watched it a week or two before. I visited Blockbuster and remembered I wanted to see the new one as I had seen the commercial but never got around to it.

Ukurse wrote:Oh, fuck I hate the 1971 version.
Stupid as fuck music, a 2 year old baby could make racket more pleasing to the ears, with a tin can and a spoon. When I watched the 1971 movie, I had to change the channel every time they broke out into a musical.

2005 version is 1million times better, it had bearable music, anyone who says otherwise is deaf. Plus some actors that could actual act.

You think this is better?

With that kind of ear rape, I'D PREFER TO BE DEAF.

loved the book, loved the old film. The new one was just weird, random and boring.