Re: Cartoon Network...

by RX Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:21 am

I like the fact that they are too lazy to give the channels proper names Razz

BBC 1, BBC 2 etc.

by JumpingJet Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:35 am

RX IS A GIRL?

by **CivBase** Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:46 am

o.O

When did this happen?

by noir Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:06 pm

Cheese wrote:Ha ha ha... BBC 4. Isn't that all like 'My house is untidy, so I'm going to get a bossy woman to shout at me for an hour - the show where a house is untidy, and a bossy woman shouts at them for an hour.'

To be fair some of them are good, but you must admit the majority is daytime garbage.

Ooops my bad I was thinking of BBC 3.

I like James May's ones on BBC 2.

Yeah, BBC4 and More4 = The very best in documentaries.

Also; Who cares if RX is/is pretending to be a girl. This is the internet!

by RX Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:07 pm

Not pretending. Just got bored and decided to switch the symbol. So I'm still a guy.

by Gold Spartan Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:05 pm

KristallNacht wrote:okay...so something about history's most famous barbarians is somehow non-historical? what?

Fur covered viking raiders get attacked by War of the Roses English soldiers, THAT is inaccurate.

by **Angatar** Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:40 pm

noir wrote:
Also; Who cares if RX is/is pretending to be a girl. This is the internet!

RX wrote:Not pretending.

Creepy ~~bastard~~ bitch.

by noir Mon Jul 06, 2009 3:14 pm

There is superstition....

by **CivBase** Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:53 pm

RX wrote:Not pretending. Just got bored and decided to switch the symbol. So I'm still a guy.

So he's not a girl...

He's just bi

by Ascendant Justice Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:27 pm

Heh just thought I'd bring this up, but about a week ago I watched the movie "300"...........on Teletoon -_-
NOT the kind of movie I would have expected to find on that kind of channel.

by KristallNacht Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:01 pm

Gold Spartan5 wrote:
KristallNacht wrote:okay...so something about history's most famous barbarians is somehow non-historical? what?

Fur covered viking raiders get attacked by War of the Roses English soldiers, THAT is inaccurate.

proof?

by Gold Spartan Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:05 pm

KristallNacht wrote:
Gold Spartan5 wrote:
KristallNacht wrote:okay...so something about history's most famous barbarians is somehow non-historical? what?

Fur covered viking raiders get attacked by War of the Roses English soldiers, THAT is inaccurate.

proof?

It was supposed to be about 1066. War of the Roses is 1400s.

by PiEdude Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:14 pm

Gold Spartan5 wrote:
KristallNacht wrote:
Gold Spartan5 wrote:
KristallNacht wrote:okay...so something about history's most famous barbarians is somehow non-historical? what?

Fur covered viking raiders get attacked by War of the Roses English soldiers, THAT is inaccurate.

proof?

It was supposed to be about 1066. War of the Roses is 1400s.

I still don't know what episode or special you're talking about.

by KristallNacht Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:30 pm

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

It was supposed to be about 1066. War of the Roses is 1400s.

i mean proof that this happened at all

by Gold Spartan Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:10 pm

http://www.amazon.com/Barbarians-History-Channel-Clancy-Brown/dp/B00014WB1G Best I can find at the moment.

http://boards.history.com/category.jspa?categoryID=3055 an entire forum on the history channel about the series.

by KristallNacht Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:59 am

and how does Barbarians have anything to do with the English fighting the vikings?

you see how nonsense your argument is?

by Gold Spartan Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:03 am

Barbarians in the series that the Brits fighting the Vikings come from.

by Ringleader Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:11 pm

Hey, new logger show on discovery!

HORAY!!!

by Sponsored content