Cartoon Network...

Arbiter Mereel wrote:well for me its Fox29, Military Channel and TWC

ew fox


all I watch is the discovery networks.

Fox News: HACKERS NEOCONS ON STERIODS.

noir wrote:Fox News: HACKERS NEOCONS ON STERIODS.

well i need to watch local news some how and CBS3 fails so pluse Fox has good shows

Well, I guess.. there must be something better than fox tho, those people are batshit insane

Well, let me rephrase, the History channel fails. What it does right is outshown by what it does wrong. I just cant get over how NOTHING ever looks right before 1914. I cant call something reliable that has late 15th century Englishmen fighting vikings. the Last Stand of the 300, they pretty much said the spartans were the only ones that mattered. they waste time talking about FOOD, and I can learn more reading an Osprey book than watching a 2 hour special.

I could go on, but that should be enough.

PS: Imperial Roman Legions fighting Hannibal...fail.

gold....wtf are you talking about?

none of what you just said makes any sense

I love those 2 hour specials on the history of hotdogs

KristallNacht wrote:gold....wtf are you talking about?

none of what you just said makes any sense

It's all about how the history channel fails.

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

KristallNacht wrote:gold....wtf are you talking about?

none of what you just said makes any sense

It's all about how the history channel fails.

What in the hell are you comparing it to?

Cartoon network is full of gay cartoons...

I'm out of this thread

PiEman wrote:

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

KristallNacht wrote:gold....wtf are you talking about?

none of what you just said makes any sense

It's all about how the history channel fails.

What in the hell are you comparing it to?

Osprey. And common sense, why the HELL would you want to watch a 2 hour special on BREAD? or food? Get it away from my history dammit!

um..lets see...it is the HISTORY of food....thus HISTORY channel.


personal preference doesn't dictate if something fails.

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

PiEman wrote:

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

KristallNacht wrote:gold....wtf are you talking about?

none of what you just said makes any sense

It's all about how the history channel fails.

What in the hell are you comparing it to?

Osprey. And common sense, why the HELL would you want to watch a 2 hour special on BREAD? or food? Get it away from my history dammit!

What's Osprey, and why should it be trusted over the History Channel?

And what's wrong with American Eats?
I loved that show.
Along with Dogfights and Shootout.

Gold Spartan5 wrote:Well, let me rephrase, the History channel fails. What it does right is outshown by what it does wrong. I just cant get over how NOTHING ever looks right before 1914. I cant call something reliable that has late 15th century Englishmen fighting vikings. the Last Stand of the 300 special, they pretty much said the spartans were the only ones that mattered. they waste time talking about FOOD, I could go on, but that should be enough.

PS: Imperial Roman Legions fighting Hannibal...fail.

That good enough for you?

Osprey is a company that accuratly depicts military history.
and I'm done here. There's no more point to this thread.

Gold Spartan5 wrote:

Gold Spartan5 wrote:Well, let me rephrase, the History channel fails. What it does right is outshown by what it does wrong. I just cant get over how NOTHING ever looks right before 1914. I cant call something reliable that has late 15th century Englishmen fighting vikings. the Last Stand of the 300 special, they pretty much said the spartans were the only ones that mattered. they waste time talking about FOOD, I could go on, but that should be enough.

PS: Imperial Roman Legions fighting Hannibal...fail.

That good enough for you?

Osprey is a company that accuratly depicts military history.

But so much of what you say is wrong.

I've never heard of the viking thing.
In the 300 special, they give a lot of credit to the Athenians, but obviously the focus of it is the Spartans.
And yes, Legions did fight Hannibal when he tried to conquer early Rome. Hell, he's practically the reason they began their continental expansion.
And I've still never heard of Osprey, post like a Wiki page or something.

I said IMPERIAL legions BIG difference. the viking one was part of their Barbarian specials, half of which were inaccurate, http://www.ospreypublishing.com/ NOW I'm done.

learn to actually cite info.

no one has seen these nonsense specials you apparently saw.

So, basically, you're alternate source is a website that's a plug for selling fiction/non-fiction military books?

That's not really the best alternate.

they did a set of episodes on history's famous Barbarians, called BARBARIANS, that they show at least twice everyone 4 months. god, and the hannibal one.....I'll get back to you on that one. Saw that one a LONG time ago.

There's nothing fiction about it, and if you actually read them, instead of watching something on TV and assuming it's real, you'd realize your mistake.

Gold Spartan5 wrote:they did a set of episodes on history's famous Barbarians, called BARBARIANS, that they show at least twice everyone 4 months. god, and the hannibal one.....I'll get back to you on that one. Saw that one a LONG time ago.

There's nothing fiction about it, and if you actually read them, instead of watching something on TV and assuming it's real, you'd realize your mistake.

I saw the Hannibal thing on Battles B.C.

6 months ago.

okay...so something about history's most famous barbarians is somehow non-historical? what?

BBC 4 > History Channel.

I don't get any limey channels (except BBC America, Robin Hood FTW!) so I've never seen that one.

Ha ha ha... BBC 4. Isn't that all like 'My house is untidy, so I'm going to get a bossy woman to shout at me for an hour - the show where a house is untidy, and a bossy woman shouts at them for an hour.'

To be fair some of them are good, but you must admit the majority is daytime garbage.

Ooops my bad I was thinking of BBC 3.

I like James May's ones on BBC 2.