Acceptance

Yam Head wrote:That doesnt bother me, just if its a both sex rhino how much am i supposed to pay it?...

rofl you dont pay lap dance rhino, lap dance rhino pays you! with semen.......

*looks at recent posts*

...and so ends this thread

...Sorry I closed up shop for the night. He'll have to come back tomorrow >.<

Yam Head wrote:...Sorry I closed up shop for the night. He'll have to come back tomorrow >.<

lmao, yes he will yes he will /thread die now

Okay thread is off topic now, and I proved my point.

SUMMARY: Furries are fine, if you don't like them fuck off.

x Gauz x wrote:Okay thread is off topic now, and I proved my point.

SUMMARY: Furries are fine, if you don't like them fuck off.

You didn't prove anything.
If you did a survey of porn sites, you'd find more for "Man on woman" or the like than you would for foot fetishes, bestiality, and similar topics. Maybe. Doing an actual survey would be the only way to find out, but assuming that "Fetishes outnumber 'normal'" is just as foolhardy as assuming that "Normal outnumbers fetishes."

We already agreed that furries don't deserve hatred, but you don't have any more basis for saying that they're 'alright' than I have to say that they are 'Beyond the standard of deviation.'

So please, do us all a favor and take that self-absorbed, self-righteous 13-year-old-behind-the-keyboard attitude of yours and

x Gauz x wrote:fuck off.

...

I'm hurt...

x Gauz x wrote:...

I'm hurt...

lol

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:You didn't prove anything.

Yes I did.

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:If you did a survey of porn sites, you'd find more for "Man on woman" or the like than you would for foot fetishes, bestiality, and similar topics. Maybe. Doing an actual survey would be the only way to find out, but assuming that "Fetishes outnumber 'normal'" is just as foolhardy as assuming that "Normal outnumbers fetishes."

I already said that? In my post I made that very clear.

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:We already agreed that furries don't deserve hatred, but you don't have any more basis for saying that they're 'alright' than I have to say that they are 'Beyond the standard of deviation.'

Okay, I can say they are 'alright' whenever I wan't to though...
Even if they are 'Beyond the standard of deviation.'

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:So please, do us all a favor and take that self-absorbed, self-righteous 13-year-old-behind-the-keyboard attitude of yours and

Rasq wrote:fuck off.

1. I am not self-absorbed
2. Nor am I acting self righteous, I am taking everyones points into consideration and am not blatantly ignoring all of the other statements.

Rasq'uire'laskar wrote:

x Gauz x wrote:Okay thread is off topic now, and I proved my point.

SUMMARY: Furries are fine, if you don't like them fuck off.

You didn't prove anything.
If you did a survey of porn sites, you'd find more for "Man on woman" or the like than you would for foot fetishes, bestiality, and similar topics. Maybe. Doing an actual survey would be the only way to find out, but assuming that "Fetishes outnumber 'normal'" is just as foolhardy as assuming that "Normal outnumbers fetishes."

We already agreed that furries don't deserve hatred, but you don't have any more basis for saying that they're 'alright' than I have to say that they are 'Beyond the standard of deviation.'

So please, do us all a favor and take that self-absorbed, self-righteous 13-year-old-behind-the-keyboard attitude of yours and

x Gauz x wrote:fuck off.

I don't think his use of the term 'alright' deviated far from your statement that furries "don't deserve hatred."

So, I admit, Gauz didn't deserve EVERYTHING I threw at him, but his

Fuck off

attitude that he has so willingly displayed here and in other threads has been getting on my nerves.
In page three,

x Gauz x wrote:Correct, although that is totally irrelevant to wether or not furries are 'normal'. A furry is a fetish, and in the US there is not a dominate fetish. Meaning there is no specificly 'normal' fetish meaning targeting furries is a stupid hate crime. Why not make fun of people with ballon fetishes?

He appears to believe that we are ragging on furries specifically. We are not. At least I'm not, I'm not so sure about DNM. It's just that furries are not only more vocal about their fetish (They have conventions) but their fetish is closer to bestiality than, say, expansion fetishes.

Furthermore, as I have tried to explain, the best way to define 'normal' is 'An absence of fetishes'. As in 'attracted to childbearing'. The way we seem to have defined fetishes is 'A sexual devotion to traits other than child-bearing or other than survival".

My attitude comes from the fact I do not like seeing people get hurt, I am defensive when it comes to other peoples emotions.

The reason why I am defending furries soley, is because that is the only fetish I really am seeing getting pounded. I really don't see many other people attacking other fetishes, so I don't, or can, defend them.

Furry hentai for the win!

LH Justin wrote:Furry hentai for the win!

Umm.. okay..
That's the spirit!!!

RX wrote:

LH Justin wrote:Furry hentai for the win!

Umm.. okay..
That's the spirit!!!

It was just a joke RX...

Also, stop the white text shit.

LH Justin wrote:

RX wrote:

LH Justin wrote:Furry hentai for the win!

Umm.. okay..
That's the spirit!!!

It was just a joke RX...

Also, stop the white text shit.

White text is teh shit!
If you're too lazy to highlight it, then that's your problem. ^_^