ZOMG! COD5!

Activision Blizzard..

You will soon see a hybrid game.. FPS + Tony Hawk+ MMORPG

call of Warhawk

would be called World of Duty: the hawk

Call of Warcraft

Lets call it
"The only game on the shelf that doesn't suck my balls"
Reference to Pure Pwnage

Ukurse wrote:Lets call it
"The only game on the shelf that doesn't suck my ball"
Reference to Pure Pwnage

Dude, what happen to the other ball? Did you cut it off? If so, can I have it?

Angatar wrote:

Ukurse wrote:Lets call it
"The only game on the shelf that doesn't suck my ball"
Reference to Pure Pwnage

Dude, what happen to the other ball? Did you cut it off? If so, can I have it?

Hahahahaha.
My mistake.
Lol. XD

Ukurse wrote:I think people overrate the value of 10 American dollars.

Especially with the rapid decrease in value we're going to be seeing within the next year.

Vigil wrote:Meh. Played it, finished it and got 1000g from it.

Now I'll never play it again. I hate COD4 online and this is no different.

But the zombies!

KristallNacht wrote:

CivBase wrote:

Angatar wrote:It's not Call of Duty 5. It's Call of Duty: World at War.

It's COD 5 to me.

then you're retarded.

If you want to completely ignore the proper titling of video games, call it CoD9

Call of Duty - October 29, 2003
Call of Duty: United Offensive - September 14, 2004
Call of Duty: Finest Hour - November 16, 2004
Call of Duty 2 - October 25, 2005
Call of Duty: Big Red One - November 1, 2005
Call of Duty 3 - November 7, 2006
Call of Duty: Roads to Victory - March 14, 2007
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare - November 7, 2007

I consider US Offence, Finest Hour, Big Red One, and Roads to Victory to be expansion games.

x Gauz x wrote:Meh..
IMO, they did fine with COD4 and WaW, so MW2 will do just as well. IMO..

A lot of people hated CoD 4, idk why, but I liked it. The problem with WaW is it's the same exact thing with a worse storyline and more swearing. The only reason I wanted it was for the zombie game, which is awesome! If I want to play online, though, I'll just go to CoD 4.

KristallNacht wrote:Infinity Ward (the true creators of CoD) only Made Call of Duty, Call of Duty 2, and Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Treyarch and all other call of duty developers aren't true call of duty

previously they kept ALL non IW CoDs without number but CoD3 made it through because activision is full of fail.

Eh, I still consider them as expansion games.


Anyways, the new zombie game is awesome in my opinion.

I thought that COD4 and WaW are both good games, since I don't care for their story line, its the multiplayer that I approve of..

'But the zombies!'

They suck monkey spluge.

Left 4 Dead has done the same thing better. BY FAR.

Nazi Zombies seemed like a desperate cry trying to make the game different from COD4. They failed.

It's no different from COD4 or COD3.

And people accuse RE5 for being a copy of RE4.

COD:Waw is a complete rip-off COD4.

It's a waste of disc space as far I'm concerned.

I am not looking forward to Modern Warfare 2.

I didn't like L4D that much...

And Nazi zombies is way different. The only similarity is four players in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, which is probably the most common themes in gaming history, next to WW2.

BTW, I found a trailer

CivBase wrote:I didn't like L4D that much...

And Nazi zombies is way different. The only similarity is four players in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, which is probably the most common themes in gaming history, next to WW2.

BTW, I found a trailer

Name me five games with four players fighting the zombie apocalypose. At best you'll come up with four.

Nazi zombies is a survival mode, and is very stop and start afair. L4D is much faster paced, more action packed, and I feel more exciting.

Seen it already. I wasn't impressed.

Okay, they're not all four-player, but still. Zombie Apocalypse games are huge, and they make for a great survival game. L4D is not a survival game, it has an objective other than hold out for as long as possible.

Sounds like Gears of War 2. Replace the locust with nazis, and renaim it zombie mode...

Felix wrote:Sounds like Gears of War 2. Replace the locust with nazis, and renaim it zombie mode...

And add an infinite number of rounds.
It is, but it's not a copy. This concept has been around long before either game. I was hoping Bungie would do it for Halo 2.

CivBase wrote:

Felix wrote:Sounds like Gears of War 2. Replace the locust with nazis, and renaim it zombie mode...

And add an infinite number of rounds.
It is, but it's not a copy. This concept has been around long before either game. I was hoping Bungie would do it for Halo 2.

With flood or covenant. Horde mode with flood would seam funner in my opinion

You feel exciting Vigil? Weird..

That video.. was epic.

x Gauz x wrote:You feel exciting Vigil? Weird..

That video.. was epic.

It was typical trailer bullpoopy.

I basically was

'OH LOOK AT US, WE HAVE UBER DRINKS AND ZOMBIES AND TRAPS AND STUFF. PLEASE GET OUR DLC!'

Please.....why do you think so many went back to COD4 and Halo 3?

Cuz GOW 2 was cheesy?

Vigil, every trailer does that for every game and DLC.

CivBase wrote:Cuz GOW 2 was cheesy?

Vigil, every trailer does that for every game and DLC.

Exactly.

It was mediocore and bland.

Good companies make their advertising interesting, like Bungie and Valve.

Treyarch is not a good company, not since Spider-man 2.

speaking of zombies and games that don't suck

the L4D FREE DLC is coming out this week i believe.

KristallNacht wrote:speaking of zombies and games that don't suck

the L4D FREE DLC is coming out this week i believe.

Is it?

Ah good.

The Pitt and L4D DLC all in one week.

I'll be quite happy. I love Valve and Bethesda.