Ace Combat:Assault Horizon

Choppers, and fighters and destroying cities OH MY!

6 sucked dick. 5 was FUCKING AWESOME.

Nothing beats Crimson Skies IMO.

CivBase wrote:Nothing beats Crimson Skies IMO.

zepplin combat ftw!!!

Onyxknight wrote:

CivBase wrote:Nothing beats Crimson Skies IMO.

zepplin combat ftw!!!

Zepplin... COMBAT? *buys Crimson Skies*

anyway i liked ace combat 6 story may of been meh but i doubt a game like those goes for story in depth

Onyxknight wrote:anyway i liked ace combat 6 story may of been meh but i doubt a game like those goes for story in depth

If you've played the fifth one, you'll know six's story is a piece of shit.

Nocbl2 wrote:

Onyxknight wrote:anyway i liked ace combat 6 story may of been meh but i doubt a game like those goes for story in depth

If you've played the fifth one, you'll know six's story is a piece of shit.

ive played all since 4 i think its fine im pretty sure a game based around air combat doesnt need an indepth story and how is playing as the husband of a wife that has an epic joureny suck?

Onyxknight wrote:

Nocbl2 wrote:

Onyxknight wrote:anyway i liked ace combat 6 story may of been meh but i doubt a game like those goes for story in depth

If you've played the fifth one, you'll know six's story is a piece of shit.

ive played all since 4 i think its fine im pretty sure a game based around air combat doesnt need an indepth story and how is playing as the husband of a wife that has an epic joureny suck?

Meh, I think five was a lot better.

I only played some of 6, and th story (especially the narration) was just God-awful.

Hopefully, there might even be a third person "Behind Enemy Lines" aspect to it, as implied by the guy ejecting in the trailer.

Maybe...

I still think Silent Thunder is one of the best Air Combat games ever simply because choppers can kill you quite frequently

I'm actually hoping they'll pull a Clone Wars and have you partly in vehicles and partly on the ground. A "behind enemy lines" stealth mission would ROCK.

I liked 6 and thought that was actually better than 5

Avenged wrote:I liked 6 and thought that was actually better than 5

Graphically, but the controls were the same and the story sucked. The fights in 5 were also a LOT more fun.

PiEdude wrote:I only played some of 6, and th story (especially the narration) was just God-awful.

Hopefully, there might even be a third person "Behind Enemy Lines" aspect to it, as implied by the guy ejecting in the trailer.

Maybe...

Because that worked sooo well in Star Wars Rogue Squadron III: Rebel Strike.

Vigil wrote:

PiEdude wrote:I only played some of 6, and th story (especially the narration) was just God-awful.

Hopefully, there might even be a third person "Behind Enemy Lines" aspect to it, as implied by the guy ejecting in the trailer.

Maybe...

Because that worked sooo well in Star Wars Rogue Squadron III: Rebel Strike.

Meh, that game did it horribly. SW: CW did it in a MUCH better way.

Vigil wrote:

PiEdude wrote:I only played some of 6, and th story (especially the narration) was just God-awful.

Hopefully, there might even be a third person "Behind Enemy Lines" aspect to it, as implied by the guy ejecting in the trailer.

Maybe...

Because that worked sooo well in Star Wars Rogue Squadron III: Rebel Strike.

Personally, I didn't mind it.

The only thing that bothered me was that the "single shot" blaster worked like a heavy machine gun...

yes, it did work well /Sarcasum