Call of Duty MW 2 or Halo ODST?

Which one are you expecting to be better.

It's not Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, its just Modern Warfare 2, and I'm probably expecting ODST more, just because it looks like a Halo game with a good campaign, something that they have lacked since the first one, and so long as firefight is 4 player splitscreen, then it looks good to me.

Modern Warfare 2.

Look at all the other Halo games. There is a trend going, and if it continues, ODST will be worse than Halo Wars.

Angatar losses because he fails to understand its not the number of halo games that makes it bad, its the developer. And bungie is making this one...

Well, I really want ODST, but I also want MW 2 because of its MP.

Nuetral

Bungie also made Halo 2 which was worse than Halo CE. Bungie also made Halo 3, which was worse than Halo 2 and Halo CE. There is a trend.

Angatar your forgetting one thing about Halo ODST. It has the Firefight mode. If its anything like Gears's Horde mode then it alone will probably make up for any bad campaign that ODST might have.

So I am more excited for Halo ODST. I will probably end up getting Modern Warfare 2 if it looks worth the while but Halo is a definite purchase.

...

No, they weren't bad...

I think you thinking that way is the trend.

Firefight doesn't sound that fun. Knowing I'm going to lose doesn't really make me want to play it.

Are you kidding me? Its you and a group of friends playing a survival game, where you can exercise teamwork (I know "teamwork" may sound foreign to a Halo game) to kill hordes of stupid covenant.

Tell me sir have you played Horde mode?

inb4lolgearssucks

http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=75518
Night vision goggles with the Modern Warfare 2 Prestige edition. Definitely getting this, especially since they just opened up a Gamestop right across from my school (one of the few in Canada).

Elabajaba wrote:http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=75518
Night vision goggles with the Modern Warfare 2 Prestige edition. Definitely getting this, especially since they just opened up a Gamestop right across from my school (one of the few in Canada).

Cool. So now I can wear those with my Masterchief helmet and my Gears of War Lancer, then come to school the next day and show all my friends how cool I am.

Ascendant Justice wrote:Are you kidding me? Its you and a group of friends playing a survival game, where you can exercise teamwork (I know "teamwork" may sound foreign to a Halo game) to kill hordes of stupid covenant.

Tell me sir have you played Horde mode?

inb4lolgearssucks

There have been 3 instances of teamwork with Halo. All of them when Bungie was creating the game, never when playing.

Stupid Covenant doesn't sound fun. I want a realistic gametype, where you can actually win. You never win in a survival game mode, and you can win in a real war.

Real war is bad...

Virtual war is good, therefore firefight = win

Angatar wrote:

Ascendant Justice wrote:Are you kidding me? Its you and a group of friends playing a survival game, where you can exercise teamwork (I know "teamwork" may sound foreign to a Halo game) to kill hordes of stupid covenant.

Tell me sir have you played Horde mode?

inb4lolgearssucks

There have been 3 instances of teamwork with Halo. All of them when Bungie was creating the game, never when playing.

Stupid Covenant doesn't sound fun. I want a realistic gametype, where you can actually win. You never win in a survival game mode, and you can win in a real war.

...If you don't like games where you lose then your going to LOVE Halo: Reach. There probably is a way to "win" but I don't think that Bungie has released much info on the gametype.

There is no way to win. It's a survival gametype, not a campaign.

Angatar wrote:There is no way to win. It's a survival gametype, not a campaign.

........God your impossible....

How? A survival gametype is to see how long you can survive, which means you always die. Dying=lose.

AJ, don't argue with it, it has too much of a pride.

Angatar wrote:How? A survival gametype is to see how long you can survive, which means you always die. Dying=lose.

*eyes narrow* We can do this aaallll night bitch just accept that you can "win" in a survival game and it will all be over. Survival games usually do have a limit to them, and if you survive until the limit, or a certain wave, you WIN. If you have a team of competent friends then victory can be at whatever you want it to be. Set a goal. I/we will complete *insert wave# here* or achieve *insert score here*. Achieving the goal results in victory.

Or if there is no limit and say you reach a score of 56700 before dying, then restart and achieve a score of 89300 before dying then you beat your previous record. To beat something usually means to "win". Therefore you won the game and beat your previous score, now the bar has been set a little higher.

The cycle will continue until all the little 12 year olds on the leaderboards look upon your score with glittering eyes in aw and amazement at your awesomeness. Even then a person will (probably) beat you, then you go back and get a higher score then them, thus achieving victory over them....otherwise known as winning.

Gauz wrote:AJ, don't argue with it, it has too much of a pride.

This will continue until the world ends.

Winning is possible in a survival game, end of story.

Please tell me that you are not serious!?







ODST will not even be half of as great as MW2.
You can not even compare the two games, it is like comparing Mario and TF2, Mario is just shit, TF2 destroys Mario. Just like how MW2 will destroys ODST.

ODST will have a boring multiplayer, that will be as interesting as Nazi Zombies, or Horde. And all campaigns can only be played through twice at most. Were as MW2 will have a campaign that is just as great, plus an actually good Multiplayer.

I probably will not buy ODST if it is same price as normal games.

At the end of that post, put IMO...

Gauz wrote:Angatar losses because he fails to understand its not the number of halo games that makes it bad, its the developer. And bungie is making this one...

So its in the hands of the people that created an awesome IP and slowly degraded over time with nonsensical plot items and holes?

thats SOOO much better.

Gauz wrote:AJ, don't argue with it, it has too much of a pride.

Stop whining that you lost.

Angatar wrote:

Gauz wrote:AJ, don't argue with it, it has too much of a pride.

Stop whining that you lost.

Hey captain-pride we ain't done yet.